blood_winged: (Default)
blood_winged ([personal profile] blood_winged) wrote2010-05-03 04:28 pm
Entry tags:

Writer's Block: Pet central

[Error: unknown template qotd]
I have to say I quirked an eyebrow at this.

Certainly (taking my own dog as an example) a pet needs to be raised correctly, much the same as a child, so they know what they should and should not do. They rely on a human in the same way a child relies on their parents, to protect them and care for them, and I suppose in that way a human can be called the 'guardian' of an animal.

But, unlike a child, a dog/cat, particularly one who has always been around people, will not be able to take care of itself in the way a human child eventually will. I wouldn't say that I am the guardian of my dog or any pet I've had because that would imply an equal relationship. I am the master, my dog is the pet.

tl;dr - Disagree. I'm the owner of my dog.

[identity profile] lemiru.livejournal.com 2010-05-03 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not even 'paying for it', I mean, you pay for a child, too (not... to get it, but for food and stuff). But being an owner makes it yours more definitely and with more responsibilities than being "just" a guardian.

[identity profile] lemiru.livejournal.com 2010-05-03 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
"more defenitely" is everything but proper english.

/slinks awaaaay~